Female Reproductive Health in SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Era.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic struck global health systems with overgrowing demands in many fields of health care; yet, reproductive care, particularly pregnancy care remains a special focus of interest. Pregnancy is a major physiologic change that alters temporarily normal function of many organs, and specifically the immune system. Therefore, pregnant women are more susceptible to respiratory pathogens compared to the others. The current pandemic may have serious consequences on pregnancy whether directly or indirectly. In the present review, direct and indirect possible adverse effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on female reproductive system by focusing on pregnancy and delivery has been discussed in details. In addition, the pregnancy consequences and whether maternal infection can affect infants were deliberated. The adverse impact of luck down and related psychological complications and obesity on pregnant women were discussed as well. Finally, the effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on maternal health and pregnancy outcome was analyzed.

Predictive performance of qSOFA in confirmed COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department.

Objectives: It is critical to quickly and easily identify coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients who become severely or even critically ill. Thus, this study was conducted to determine the accuracy of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score in predicting the severity and mortality of COVID-19 patients. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study of COVID-19 patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) between June 22, 2021, and November 21, 2021. The clinical characteristics of the participants were collected by the emergency physicians. The correlation of the qSOFA, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria (SIRS), Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), and confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, 65 years of age and older (CURB-65) scores for 14-day mortality were evaluated. The area under a receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis was calculated to compare the effectiveness of qSOFA, SIRS, PSI, and CURB-65 to predict severe disease. Results: Eight hundred and ninety-four subjects were included. Of them, 721 patients (80.6%) survived after 14 days of admission. The mean age was 58.92 ± 17.80 years, and 551 subjects (61.6%) were male. Nonsurvived patients were significantly older (51.09 ± 23.60 vs. 38.10 ± 18.24, P = 0.004) and had more comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, respiratory, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular disease) in comparison with survived patients. For COVID-19 mortality prediction, the AUROCs of qSOFA, CURB-65, PSI, and SIRS score were 0.799 (95% confidence interval [CI 0.771-0.825]), 0.829 (95% CI [0.803-0.853]), 0.830 (95% CI [0.804-0.854]), and 0.759 (95% CI [0.730-0.787]), respectively. All scores were good predictors of COVID-19 mortality. Conclusion: The qSOFA was more successful than SIRS in predicting mortality for COVID-19 patients and was similar to CURB-65 and PSI. Therefore, the qSOFA score can be considered a simple and rapid screening tool for identifying high-risk patients.

Physiologic Scoring Systems in Predicting the COVID-19 Patients' one-month Mortality; a Prognostic Accuracy Study.

Introduction : It is critical to quickly and easily identify severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and predict their mortality. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of the physiologic scoring systems in predicting the mortality of COVID-19 patients. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was performed on COVID-19 patients admitted to the emergency department (ED). The clinical characteristics of the participants were collected by the emergency physicians and the accuracy of the Quick Sequential Failure Assessment (qSOFA), Coronavirus Clinical Characterization Consortium (4C) Mortality, National Early Warning Score-2 (NEWS2), and Pandemic Respiratory Infection Emergency System Triage (PRIEST) scores for mortality prediction was evaluated. Results: Nine hundred and twenty-one subjects were included. Of whom, 745 (80.9%) patients survived after 30 days of admission. The mean age of patients was 59.13 ± 17.52 years, and 550 (61.6%) subjects were male. Non-Survived patients were significantly older (66.02 ± 17.80 vs. 57.45 ± 17.07, P< 0.001) and had more comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, respiratory, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular disease) in comparison with survived patients. For COVID-19 mortality prediction, the AUROCs of PRIEST, qSOFA, NEWS2, and 4C Mortality score were 0.846 (95% CI [0.821-0.868]), 0.788 (95% CI [0.760-0.814]), 0.843 (95% CI [0.818-0.866]), and 0.804 (95% CI [0.776-0.829]), respectively. All scores were good predictors of COVID-19 mortality. Conclusion: All studied physiologic scores were good predictors of COVID-19 mortality and could be a useful screening tool for identifying high-risk patients. The NEWS2 and PRIEST scores predicted mortality in COVID-19 patients significantly better than qSOFA.

Vulnerability of The Male Reproductive System to SARS-CoV-2 Invasion: Potential Role for The Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone Grp78/HSPA5/BiP.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) may adversely affect male reproductive tissues and male
fertility. This concern is elicited by the higher susceptibility and mortality rate of men to the SARS-CoV-2 mediated coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), compared to the women. SARS-CoV-2 enters host cells after binding to a functional receptor named angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) and then replicates in the host cells and gets released into the plasma. SARS-CoVs use the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as a site for viral protein synthesis and processing, as well as glucose-regulated protein 78 (Grp78) is a key ER chaperone involved in protein folding by preventing newly synthesized proteins from aggregation.
Therefore, we analyzed Grp78 expression in various human organs, particularly male reproductive organs, using Broad
Institute Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), and Human Protein Atlas online
datasets. Grp78 is expressed in male reproductive tissues such as the testis, epididymis, prostate, and seminal vesicle. It can facilitate the coronavirus entry into the male reproductive tract, providing an opportunity for its replication. This link between the SARS-CoV-2 and the Grp78 protein could become a therapeutic target to mitigate its harmful effects on male fertility.

COVID-19 management in the emergency ward.

The confirmed and suspected cases of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have increased in the entire world. There is still no vaccine or definitive treatment for this virus due to its unknown pathogenesis and proliferation pathways. Optimized supportive care remains the main therapy, and the clinical efficacy for the subsequent agents is still under investigation. Enormous demand for handling the COVID-19 outbreak challenged both the health-care personnel and medical supply system. As outbreaks of COVID-19 develop, prehospital workers, emergency medical services personnel, and other emergency responders are potentially asked to follow specific practice guidelines to mitigate the effects of an escalating pandemic. In this article, we have summarized the current guidance on potential COVID-19 management options. The recent experience with COVID-19 provided lessons on strategy and policymaking that the government and ministry of health should be on the alert and concentrate more on capacity to manage an outbreak like COVID-19. It is important to consider the new data that emerge daily regarding clinical characteristics, treatment options, and outcomes for COVID-19.

Possible Male Reproduction Complications after Coronavirus Pandemic.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), as a severe respiratory disease, affects various tissues and organs. The specific SARS-CoV-2 receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), is highly expressed in male gonads. Thus, male reproductive tissues could be a potential target for virus colonization. We performed a comprehensive search in PubMed and Google Scholar to retrieve relevant articles published till 15 April 2021. The keywords used were: male fertility, male reproductive health, semen parameters, sex hormones, SARS-CoV-2, and COVID-19. Validated evidence about the adverse effects of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on the male reproductive system is limited and few studies have reported semen analysis results or presence of viral RNA in semen samples of infected men. Nevertheless, alterations in reproductive hormones such as decreased level of testosterone (T) with raised luteinizing hormone (LH) have been reported in some patients. Although the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the male reproduction health remains unclear, evidence suggests that male gonads may be potentially vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this article, we discussed the possible impacts of COVID-19 on male gonads, sex hormones, and semen quality and suggested preventive solutions.